Volvo XC40 Recharge

2021 onwards

Following on from a ten day test drive in the Volvo V60 T6 plug-in hybrid in June 2021, I was really pleased that Volvo were able to lend me their XC40 pure electric car.  This was to be a proper test, again to include a trip away with the caravan.

The XC40 was delivered on a Tuesday morning, allowing me a few days to get used to it before setting off on our short caravan break.

The car was delivered before 9:00 a.m. with a little under 55% charge in its batteries.  The driver had phoned to say he would find somewhere to charge it, but I suggested that he didn’t need to worry and that getting a charge was something that I was going to need to sort as part of the review.

I immediately jumped in the car and drove to my local Tesco to grab some bits for breakfast (I tend to eat late, as part of my two meals a day), plugging the car into the free chargers whilst I shopped.  I probably shouldn’t have bothered, as I was in and out so quick that the battery charge percentage didn’t seem too have changed at all.

Charging Woes

After breakfast and a shower my girlfriend and I decided to drive down to Hill Cottage Farm, the site we would be towing the caravan to on the Friday, aiming to see what percentage battery we used without the caravan on the back, so that I could compare this to the same journey with the additional weight and drag and see how it impacts the range.  We used 12% of the battery on this journey.

After briefly stopping at the site and saying hello to some friends who were already there, we paid a visit to Burley for a cream tea, before heading to Ringwood to do a little shopping.  We had been invited to a BBQ with the friends at the caravan site and we were supplying the salad.

I tried to use the ZapMap App on my phone to locate a suitable super charger to get a top up, but a complete lack of mobile phone signal thwarted me.  I therefore headed in the general direction of Ringwood and used the car’s SatNav to look for a fast charger, so that I could boost the battery whilst shopping.

Having never previously used a ‘proper’ fast public charger, I arrived at the car park near Waitrose in Ringwood and set about getting the car charged.

Following the written instructions on the unit, I went to the GeniePoint website and created an account, allowing them to take £10 from my bank account. I then set about starting a charge. But, the charger I was at wasn’t listed as an option.

I phoned the number on the unit and, after various messages, got put through to someone who asked how they could help.  I explained the situation and, before any support could be offered, the call was disconnected.

In the automated messages, reference had been made to their App, so I went to the App Store and downloaded it.  Logging into the App I again started the process of getting a charge.  And, again, the charger wasn’t listed as an option.

I phoned again and, unless all operatives give the same name, spoke to the same person.  I said, “we spoke a few minutes ago, but we were cut off,” before re-explaining the problem.  She asked for the unit number and then confirmed the unit was out of order.  There was nothing on the unit to indicate that it wasn’t working, but apparently I should have known that the absence of information on the screen should have alerted me to its broken state.

She directed me to drive to Ferndown and use their charger at the Esso garage, saying it was working and not currently being used.

So, we drove to Ferndown.  I did my quick shop at the Sainsbury’s before going to the Esso garage.  When I pulled onto the forecourt, I noticed that there was a car parked in the sole space for charging, so I parked nearby and went to see if I could check how long the existing user would be.

I then noticed that the car using the space wax actually a Maserati SUV; not a BEV or a PHEV.  Two guys (maybe a father and son) noticed me and said that they’d been unable to trace the owner of the Maserati.  They had been into the forecourt shop and been told that the owner had said he had broken down and would be back in ten minutes.

Obviously, cars break down, but most drivers, surely, don’t park their broken ICE vehicles in the sole spot for EV charging!  It’s not as if there were no alternatives, the father and son were parked on the forecourt and I had managed to park too.  There were plenty of alternatives to blocking the only space for EV charging.

The two men, who were on their way to watch Bournemouth play football, had been waiting five minutes or so already, but it wasn’t clear how long the SUV driver had actually been gone, or how much linger he would really be.  Plus, of course, the two guys who were driving a Nissan Leaf were ahead of me in the queue for the charger… if and when the ICE driver returned.

So, we headed off to our BBQ without gaining a charge.  The BBQ was great and we enjoyed an evening of friendly banter.

When we set off from the caravan site we had 20% battery showing and the car posed the question, “do you want to navigate to a nearby charger?”

“Yes”, I responded.

But, all the chargers it was showing in the list were shown as ‘slow’ and I’m guessing this refers to ‘destination chargers’ or the free ones you get at supermarkets.  I didn’t want to sit in the car for ages whilst the car was charging and my girlfriend was tired and in need of her bed, so I decided to just head home and cross my fingers.

I know I only used 12% getting to the site, but the return journey was in the dark, so I’d be using lights, and the temperature had dropped so the heating would be on.  I was ‘confident’ we’d make it back, but took it easy and avoided heavy acceleration ‘just in case’.

And, yes, we did make it back and still had 10% showing as available charge when I parked on the drive.  However, the stress of (for the first time) finding a broken charger, followed by an ICEd charger, was not great.  I learned the lesson that, for the moment, you really should plan ahead if you want to use public charge points.

Having parked on the driveway I charged the Volvo in using the ‘granny-charger’ plugged into a three pin socket in my caravan.  The car was plugged in for a little over 12 hours overnight and this was enough to deliver an additional 35% charge; it’s slow, but it works.

The following day, after dropping my girlfriend at work, I looked on the GeniePoint App for my nearest charger and found there were a few within two miles of my home, although one was shown as ‘Faulted’.  I drove to the one on the A303, 1.8 miles away and started a charge.  Now, the GeniePoint App stated that there were three connectors; two at 50kWh and one at 43kWh.  Someone was charging their EV already and, just as I arrived, a man parked his old style Land Rover Defender in the space next to him.  I wound down the window and, politely, asked if he’d mind moving to another space so that I could reverse in and charge.  He did so happily and all was good, or so I thought.  I plugged the car in using the tethered cable I found on the side of the charge box and started the charge on my App, before going into the garage shop to get a drink.  I was quite a while as there was a family debating what they wanted and adding more and more to their order in the Greggs outlet, but I got my orange juice and a naughty donut before heading back to the car.

Once I’d finished my caramel custard donut, the chaps from the other EV came over and asked me if I was getting a charge.  Whilst I looked at the App to check for progress, he explained that his charge had stopped as soon as I had plugged in.  He’d phoned customer support and, after resetting things, he was again getting a charge.  However, he was worried that this meant I had lost charge and so I opened the App on my phone and checked.

According to the App, I was getting a charge at a rate of 1.7kWh.  The chap from the other car, who was clearly far more knowledgeable than me, said I was only ever going to achieve 7kWh from the type of charger I was using, which had a similar connector to the ones people have on their 7kW home chargers.  I did find this confusing, given the App showing that the chargers were either 50kW or 43kW, but in any event I was getting nowhere near that and was being charged for getting less than I could achieve via a three pin socket at home.

I returned home and charged via my caravan again.

These are issues that are clearly affecting the public charging network, meaning that planning and hiccups are going to be part of the user experience for the moment.  However, things are improving and these would not be so much of an issue if I had a proper EV charger at home.

I should add that I did have two occasions where I did manage to charge effectively using public chargers.  The first time was at the Esso garage in Ferndown after a day at Moors Valley Country Park and just prior to going to dinner.  A Tesla driver was using the charger and I pulled up next to him to ask, politely, how long they might be.  He checked his system and said he had 15 minutes left, but said that he was happy with the charge he already had and that he’d let me have the charger; even though I stressed that I wasn’t in a massive rush.  We gained a decent charge whilst I made a phone call.

The information on the display showed the charge rate in a number of ways, including a miles per hour figure showing the range being obtained.  At this charger it was showing a rate of 140+mph, which looked pretty impressive. 

However, a couple of days later we used the Instavolt chargers next to the Costa coffee shop at Solstice Park, on the outskirts of Amesbury, and were achieving a rate of 222+mph.  There were two chargers at this location and one was already being used when we arrived.  A car was parked in the (non-charging) parking space next to the space in front of the other charger, and I was able to reverse into the space and commence a charge.  However, the space was very tight and it was quite a job manoeuvring the cable around the car and plugging it in.  It struck me that if it was an effort for me as a large, but essentially able-bodied, man, it would be virtually (or totally) impossible for a disabled driver, especially a wheelchair user.

It really does seem that the providers of these services need to do more to make them accessible.

Interior Space

Prior to the XC40 being delivered, a friend of mine had commented that he had been loaned one recently whilst his XC60 was in for a service.  He opined that the XC40 was really quite small and showed concern as to how I would cope with it.

He shouldn’t have worried.  Whilst I am a big chap, I found the car to be quite spacious and comfortable.  It obviously isn’t as large as the XC60 and XC90, but I didn’t feel more cramped that I had felt in the V60 I drove a couple of months earlier.

There is plenty of head room, even for a six foot lump like me, and the seat had loads of adjustment to ensure the comfort of the driver.  It isn’t a large car, perhaps, but we still didn’t have any issues when we gave a lift to my daughter and her 6ft+ boyfriend.

The sense of space was improved with the inclusion of a double length panoramic roof, the front part of which also retracts allowing some fresh air motoring; very apt given the lack of tail-pipe emissions.

The boot is a decent size, but not quite cavernous.  It did manage to a large cool box, which was plugged in to keep the contents cold on the journey, bags, crates, a bottle bag for a dozen bottles of wine and other (non-alcoholic) beverages, a laptop bag and the case containing my CPAP machine.  I’m sure that, with better planning, I could have fitted more in too.

The ‘frunk’ offers up more space, but this would typically just be the place to store the two charge cables that the Volvo is provided with.

The Towing Test

The V60 T6 Hybrid I had tested previously had a button to push when reversing up to the tow bar, which focussed the camera on assisting the placing of the tow ball under the hitch.  The XC40 did not have this and it was only a few days later that I realised the were options to change the camera to one that allows you to see the tow ball.  That said, I still had no problems in getting the car hooked up.

The lack of adjustable air suspension and the relatively high height of the car did lead to me slightly grounding the rear of the caravan as I drove off the sloped driveway and this did lead to me looking at alternative options when I came back a few days later.

Having successfully navigated off my driveway and out of the close where we live, we headed onto the A343 to Salisbury.  The XC40 towed with ease and it certainly did not feel at all strained.  It pulled the caravan with ease and never felt underpowered or slow.

I did have cars queueing behind me as I drove through Salisbury at 30mph, but when we reached the national speed limit roads and I accelerated up to 50mph they disappeared into the distance behind me.  The beauty of electric motors is the absence of a ‘power band’, or needing to get the revs up in order to accelerate.  Just push the quiet pedal and the speed increase quickly, even with almost one and a half tons of caravan behind you!

There were some roads surfaces that caused a feeling of almost lurching down the road, but I have experienced something similar, albeit to a lesser extent, when towing with my Audi A6 Allroad and can’t be sure this was entirely an issue with the tow vehicle.  It is likely that this would be less pronounced if the UK's roads weren't so poorly kept.

There were parts of the journey where we encountered heavy traffic, crawling around the inner ring road in Salisbury towards the notorious roundabout junction with Southampton Road.  Towing in such conditions can be trying, but no so in the XC40.  Progress was smooth and controlled.  Whilst it is obviously important to retain focus on the road, the Volvo’s driver assistance does keep the car (and the caravan behind it) moving along with the traffic, adjusting the speed and bringing us to a halt when necessary.  A slight push on the accelerator, when safe to proceed, instructs the car to resume progress.  This takes a lot less effort than towing in similar circumstances with my usual tow car and, as a result, isn’t as stressful or tiring.

The car can be configured to operate on a ‘one pedal’ basis, which is something I had selected on the first day, and this applies equally when towing.

During the whole journey to the campsite, I felt the need to use the brake pedal just one time; when a post office van slowed quicker than I expected, turning into a car park ahead of the roundabout where I had thought they were turning.  It’s quite possible that the car would have coped with this purely from the throttle being released completely, but it wasn’t worth taking that risk.

We arrived safely and happily at the site near Fordingbridge and I found that I had used 22% of the battery in getting there.  On a like for like comparison, there was an increase of about 85% in the energy consumed when towing.  If this were typical of the impact of towing, then the car’s stated maximum range of 250 miles would be reduced to 137.5 miles.  I had not made any effort to drive economically when towing to the site, having accelerated swiftly (rather than hard) frequently to see how the car coped with increasing speeds, both from standstill and from 30mph to 50mph.  It may therefore be possible to beat these figures.

I should also mention that the 250 mile stated range is beatable.  Based upon my return trip from Alderholt to Andover, where I covered 29.5 miles and used 10% of the battery’s capacity, it is possible to get closer to 300 miles range from the Volvo and, using similarly gentle driving, it might therefore be possible to achieve a range of 150 to 165 miles whilst towing a 1,450kg caravan.

The return trip home from the caravan site, after what was a lovely long weekend, was plagued with travel disruptions.  The first diversion happened in Fordingbridge, where the road through the town to the main road to Salisbury was closed.  I instead headed in the other direction on the A338, towards Ringwood, with Google Maps trying to get me to use some rather small roads as a means to turn back.  As the system had not been configured to take account of the Venus caravan being pulled behind me, I elected not to take turns into what appeared to be narrow roads leading to small and, probably, difficult to navigate villages.

I did try turning round by pulling in at the Old Beams Inn and using the exit of the car park into Mockbeggar Lane as a means to effect a u-turn, but an HGV driver on a mandated break (which I obviously had no issue with) left me insufficient room to safely undertake the manoeuvre.  So I continued onto Ringwood and decided to see it as encouragement to test the Volvo as a tow car on the dual carriageways and motorways that would lead me home.

The XC40 coped admirably with these roads and I was able to move along at the reduced speed limit applicable to cars towing caravans or trailers with absolute ease.  Surprisingly, even at such speeds, I found myself needing to pull out into the overtaking lane to pass slower moving cars and, less surprisingly, lorries.  This was handled without any struggle, even when the adaptive cruise control had slowed my pace down to 50-55mph.  As soon as I had indicated my intention to change lane and started the manoeuvre, the Volvo increased the speed safely back to the pre-set 60mph and I was able to overtake the slower moving vehicles before resuming my place in the normal driving lane.

The SatNav suggested I turn off the M27 very soon after continuing onto it from the A31 and I, wrongly, assumed this was just trying to get me back onto the more direct routes along the more minor A roads, rather than the long loop around the more major routes.  So, I stuck with the M27 and then the M3, even after Google Maps tried diverting me off at nearly every junction.  The traffic got slower and slower and I really should have got the message earlier.  Truth told, I was simply enjoying the ease of towing the caravan along the major routes, even if the progress was sedate… at best.

I eventually turned off into Winchester and took on the one way system from Bar End, through the city centre and out on the Andover Road.  I’m sure this was the least sensible option, but it again showed how easy it was to tow with the all electric SUV in different environments.

Overall, I would say that the Volvo surpassed my expectations as a tow car.  But that would not be to say that it was without fault.  I did mention earlier the tendency for the car to lurch a bit over some road surfaces, something that may have been made worse by the use of cruise control.  The car would also benefit from adjustable suspension; or at least I would have benefited from it.  Getting the caravan off my drive caused some grounding at the rear and being able to lower the suspension would have enabled me to reverse the van back onto the driveway.  After an aborted attempt to use the motor mover, during which the pneumatic jockey wheel exploded, I ended up having to use the Allroad to get it back in its position in front of my garage.

Driving Experience (not towing)

The Volvo is a comfortable car to drive in various environments.  In fact, I didn’t find any driving conditions in which the car was anything but a pleasure to be behind the wheel of.  The seats are extremely comfortable and adjustable in many different ways.  Most of this is done electrically, but the seat squab can be extended manually.

The throttle response is instant and this power is available at any speed.  There is no vibration caused by a petrol or diesel engine and none of the noise that comes with such internal combustion engines.  As a result, the drive is relaxed and comfortable; for the driver and any passengers.

Well, it is relaxed when the driver wishes it to be relaxed.

Given the torque available from the XC40, the driver is able to exhort startling performance at almost any speed, without necessarily needing to break the speed limit.  Several passengers were extremely surprised at the car’s acceleration, whether this was from standstill or when exiting lower speed limit zones.

As much as I would keep telling people it was a small SUV and not a sports car, I frequently wondered whether it was in fact the fastest accelerating Volvo ever made.  I did allow intrigue to get the better of me and looked it up.  With a 0-60 time of 4.4 seconds, the twin engine S60 Polestar Engineered is actually the quickest Volvo, closely followed by the S60 T8 Twin Engine (4.6 seconds) and then the XC40 Recharge and a couple of other twin engined Volvos at 4.7 seconds.

My best guess would be that the 30 to 50 mph times of the XC40 Recharge might be more impressive than similar times for the twin engined Volvos.  Car and Driver (an American publication) recorded acceleration from 30 to 50 in just 1.6 seconds, which is extremely quick.

It also delivers this acceleration extremely confidently and without any scariness, helped perhaps by the fact that the power is delivered by two electric motors; one driving the front wheels and the other driving the rear.

Whilst you can drive the car enthusiastically and enjoy it without scaring yourself, as the driver, it is also a very easy car to drive in a more sensible manner.  As a general rule, your passengers will probably thank you for adopting the more relaxed driving style.

The car cossets the occupants, especially when driving in an unhurried manner.  It really is a pleasant place to spend time.

Verdict

I am a big fan of the XC40 Recharge.  I’ll admit that I was really sad when Volvo’s driver arrived to take it back, as indeed was my girlfriend.

It’s a great car and, if you can get past the high purchase price, I think it would be a great choice for many people.  The SUV body shape is one that is hugely popular and there really is little to fault it.

Some people did criticise the look of the front of the car, with a smooth panel in place of the grill.

This, I had thought, was simply a rejection of change, but I can see why people might not like the look.  Indeed, it seems that this was probably only like this as a result of the car being based upon an existing internal combustion engined car, rather than a bespoke design from the floor up.

Similarly, some of the interior aspects appear to be there purely because it is the same overall car as the petrol and diesel variants.   The centre console at the front is something that some pure electric vehicles can do without, or are extremely small if they exist.  This is quite big in the XC40 and I would have probably found it a bit intrusive if it weren’t for the extra feeling of space afforded by the height of the car.

These aspects will probably disappear, or at least reduce, in future versions of the car and in cars more generally.

Would this car be better if it had been designed from the floor up as a completely new battery electric vehicle?  Yes, of course it would.  But, don’t let that disguise the fact that this is a really good car; one I wish were still on my driveway.

Tow Car of the Year Award

Since having the car and  conducting my review, the Caravan and Motorhome Club (CAMC) undertook their annual tests and awards for tow cars.  BEVs featured quite prominently this year, with the Skoda Enyaq iV80 winning the category for caravans weighing under 1,100kg and the Volvo XC40 (the very car I had driven) wining the category for caravans weighing between 1,500kg and 1,700kg.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.